San Francisco’s Health Care Ordinance Challenged Again

San Francisco’s Health Care Ordinance Challenged Again

As a follow-up to last month’s Benefit Beat article, San Francisco’s Health Care Ordinance Stands, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ three-judge panel decision was not good enough for the Golden Gate Restaurant Association (GGRA).  The GGRA has requested a rehearing of this matter before the whole (en banc) 9th Circuit Panel.  In the meantime, employers still have to grapple with satisfying San Francisco’s HCSO mandate.

 

The information contained in this Benefit Beat is not intended to be legal, accounting, or other professional advice, nor are these comments directed to specific situations.

As required by U.S. Treasury rules, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this Benefit Beat is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.

San Francisco’s Health Care Ordinance Challenged AgainAs a follow-up to last month’s Benefit Beat article, San Francisco’s Health Care Ordinance Stands, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ three-judge panel decision was not good enough for the Golden Gate Restaurant Association (GGRA).  The GGRA has requested a rehearing of this matter before the whole (en banc) 9th Circuit Panel.  In the meantime, employers still have to grapple with satisfying San Francisco’s HCSO mandate....2008-11-06T17:00:00-05:00

As a follow-up to last month’s Benefit Beat article, San Francisco’s Health Care Ordinance Stands, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ three-judge panel decision was not good enough for the Golden Gate Restaurant Association (GGRA).  The GGRA has requested a rehearing of this matter before the whole (en banc) 9th Circuit Panel.  In the meantime, employers still have to grapple with satisfying San Francisco’s HCSO mandate.